Legal Opinion
Studiengesellschaft Kohle M.B.H. v. Dart Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 13, 1987No. Civ. A. 3952-CMWPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
In July of 1970, litigation began between Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH (“SGK”) and Dart Industries (“Dart”) concerning Dart’s alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 3,113,115 (“ ’115”) issued to Dr. Karl Ziegler, the predecessor in interest to SGK. This Court held the ’115 patent to be valid and infringed. Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Dart Industries, 549 F.Supp. 716 (D.Del.1982), aff'd, 726 F.2d 724 (Fed.Cir.1984). Now before the Court, twenty-three years after infringement began and seventeen years after the litigation started,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Braun Inc. And Braun Aktiengesellschaft, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Dynamics Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle, M.B.H. v. Dart Industries, Inc., and Kraft, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- ITT Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. v. Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.