Legal Opinion
Hamon v. Gardner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1957No. 37096PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
This appeal involves an action by Lloyd H. Gardner, as plaintiff, against Jake L. Hamon, Edwin B. Cox, Edwin L. Cox, Elizabeth Lockridge Cox, and Rosmo Orl Company, a corporation, as defendants, for alleged damages to land and cattle resulting from defendants’ oil mining operations under a lease from the Osage Tribe of Indians.
The Secretary of the Interior approved the oil and gas lease on the land in question in Osage County, Oklahoma, in January, 1947. Defendants acquired the lease by an assignment, approved by the Secretary of the Interior, on February 1, 1951. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- International Railway Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ada-Konawa Bridge Co. v. CargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Culver v. Mid-Continent Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Carter v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Gage v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964