Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Ron Rudin Realty Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1981No. 10883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Manoukian, J.:

In this appeal, appellant-plaintiff requests us to reverse, contending that the trial court (1) improperly granted respondent-defendant’s motion for involuntary dismissal under NRCP 41(b), and (2) improvidently determined the escrow agreement’s forfeiture clause to be invalid as a penalty. We affirm.

Appellant Bank, as executor of the estate of L. S. Brotherton, Deceased, (hereinafter referred to as Brotherton) sought the recovery of $19,000 claimed due under a forfeiture clause contained in an escrow agreement between Brotherton and Ron Rudin Realty Co.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bates v. Cottonwood Cove CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Woodard v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Fennell v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Martin v. RossNevada Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. W. Sunset 2050 Trust v. Nationstar Mortg., LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Frederic & Barbara Rosenberg Living Trust v. MacDonald Highlands Realty, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Dolorfino v. Univ. Med. Ctr. of S. Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  4. DOLORFINO VS. UNIV. MED. CTR. OF S. NEVADANevada Supreme Court · 2018
  5. DOLORFINO VS. UNIV. MED. CTR. OF S. NEVADANevada Supreme Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API