Legal Opinion

Depew v. United States

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided February 3, 1999No. Civ.A. 94-B-2490Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

Defendant, United States of America (“the United States”), pursuant to Rule 56, moves for summary judgment on its counterclaim for injunctive relief. The United States also requests that I take judicial notice of five orders issued by the United States Tax Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Plaintiff, Jay L. Depew, moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c). The motions are adequately briefed and oral argument will not aid materially their resolution. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 & 1651(a). For the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Rowlee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API