Legal Opinion
Pero v. Miller
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 1928No. 210PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
In view of these facts, it can be of little importance that the lease was defectively executed and not recorded.
The lease contains a renewal clause in the following language:
“Said second party shall have the right to renew this lease for five years provided first party shall have been given written notice at least six months before April 80, 1927.”
Pursuant to the terms of the above renewal clause the lessees mailed to the lessor on August 31, 1926, a letter postpaid, notifying him that they wanted the extension of five years as specified in the lease. The lessor denies receiving this notice,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schloss v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1920
- Gross v. ClaussOhio Court of Appeals · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- RKO Distributing Corp. v. Film Center Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Baxter v. Res. Energy Exploration Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- J. J. Newberry Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Kenneth Cole v. EV Properties, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Bernard Philip Dedor Revocable Declaration of Trust v. Res. Energy Exploration Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014