Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Real Estate Bus. Trust v. Cnty. of Anoka

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 2019No. A18-1678; A18-1679; A18-1681Published

1Opinion of the Court

CHUTICH, Justice.

*384In this consolidated tax appeal we must determine whether retail stores that permit franchisees to operate their businesses inside the retail store in exchange for rent are "income-producing properties" within the meaning of the tax statute's mandatory-disclosure provision. See Minn. Stat. § 278.05, subd. 6(a) (2018). When an owner of real property challenges the county assessor's valuation of a property that is "income-producing," the owner must disclose certain information by August 1 of the taxes-payable year. Id. Failure to disclose this information by the deadline…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Kmart Corp. v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. BFW CO. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Langer v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Kmart Corp. v. County of BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API