Wal-Mart Real Estate Bus. Trust v. Cnty. of Anoka
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
CHUTICH, Justice.
*384In this consolidated tax appeal we must determine whether retail stores that permit franchisees to operate their businesses inside the retail store in exchange for rent are "income-producing properties" within the meaning of the tax statute's mandatory-disclosure provision. See Minn. Stat. § 278.05, subd. 6(a) (2018). When an owner of real property challenges the county assessor's valuation of a property that is "income-producing," the owner must disclose certain information by August 1 of the taxes-payable year. Id. Failure to disclose this information by the deadline…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Kmart Corp. v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- BFW CO. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Langer v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Kmart Corp. v. County of BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.