Kmart Corp. v. County of Becker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
This property tax appeal raises two issues for our consideration. The first issue concerns when a property’s status as income-producing is determined for the purposes of Minn.Stat. § 278.05, subd. 6(a) (2000), the 60-Day Rule, and the second concerns whether relator provided suffi: cient income information to the county pursuant to the 60-Day Rule. The tax court ruled that the relevant date of inquiry for whether property is income-producing is the date of assessment and that the income information the relator provided within the statutory time period was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of SebekaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Wulff v. Tax Court of AppealsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- BFW CO. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Bethke v. County of BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kmart Corp. v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Irongate Enterprises Inc. v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Kmart Corp. v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Kmart Corp. v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- 78th Street OwnerCo, LLC v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.