Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 23, 1916No. 1625PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 35081 (T. D. 34279) and Abstract 38196. [Modified. — The opinion is on application for rehearing, the decision having been rendered March 28, 1916, and not published.]

1Opinion of the CourtDe Yries, Judge

This case’ was decided by this court March 28, 1916, and upon petition by the Government reargument was ordered. The court *158adheres to the conclusion reached in the former decision, and adopts this as the opinion in the case.

The merchandise is parabolic mirrors. It is identical with the merchandise the subject of decision by this court in General Electric Co. v. United States (5 Ct. Cust. Appls., 528; T. D. 35176). The court therein held that such merchandise was properly dutiable under the provisions of paragraphs 103 and 104 of the tariff act of 1909. Upon the hearing before the Board of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Michelin Tire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. United States v. SternCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. General Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thornley & Pitt Misco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Cengar U. S., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API