Dunakin v. Southwestern Consumers Co-Op. Ass'n
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Justice.
This is a suit for $50 plus a reasonable attorney’s fee on account of an overcharge for a can of tomato juice, brought under the provisions of Sec. 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix § 925(e). After trial, -but before judgment, the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration intervened. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, the plaintiff and intervenor appeal.
The portion of Sec. 205(e) of the 1942 Act material to our consideration provides:
“If any person selling a commodity violates a regulation, order, or price schedule…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Medler v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Keil v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Everly v. ZeppDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
- Brown v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crowley v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Hanock v. EckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Bayne v. KingeryWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Hanock v. EckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950