Legal Opinion

Dunakin v. Southwestern Consumers Co-Op. Ass'n

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1945No. 4867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

This is a suit for $50 plus a reasonable attorney’s fee on account of an overcharge for a can of tomato juice, brought under the provisions of Sec. 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix § 925(e). After trial, -but before judgment, the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration intervened. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, the plaintiff and intervenor appeal.

The portion of Sec. 205(e) of the 1942 Act material to our consideration provides:

“If any person selling a commodity violates a regulation, order, or price schedule…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Medler v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Keil v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Everly v. ZeppDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Brown v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crowley v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  2. Hanock v. EckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  3. Bayne v. KingeryWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hanock v. EckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API