Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Yucca Ford, Inc. v. Scarsella

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1973No. 1025Published

1ConcurrenceSutin, Judge

(specially concurring).

It would be helpful if the Supreme Court would decide this issue: In a claim for malicious prosecution, when is want of probable cause a question of law for the trial court, or a question of fact for the jury?

The main reason for a definite decision is that trial attorneys have agreed that probable cause is only a question of law for the trial court. Somerstein v. Gutierrez (Ct.App.), 85 N.M. 130, 509 P.2d 897, (1973).

The trial court and opposing counsel may not understand the language of the majority opinion and be able to apply it to the facts of a claim based on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Olguin v. ThygesenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Brown v. Village of DemingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. White v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hughes v. Van BruggenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API