Legal Opinion

United States v. Byron Keith Allen, United States of America v. Ernest Robert Reinhardt

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2007No. 05-5249, 06-4012PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge MICHAEL concurred.

OPINION

GREGORY, Circuit Judge:

Byron Allen and Ernest Reinhardt (“Appellants”) appeal, on various grounds, their convictions for wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (2000). Additionally, Reinhardt raises numerous issues concerning his seventy-month sentence. Because the district court did not commit reversible error, we affirm the Appellants’ convictions and sentences.

I

Allen and Reinhardt were indicted on multiple counts of wire fraud in violation of 18…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. David C. Hughes, the Office of the Federal Public Defender, Amicus SupportingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. United States v. Austin Webb, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Erasto Gomez-JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. James DinkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. William JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API