Legal Opinion
Van Pelt v. Skolnik
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided September 21, 2012No. 3:11-cv-00061-HDM-VPCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge.
Before the court is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (# 35). Plaintiff has opposed (# 38), and defendants have replied (# 43).
Defendants are Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”) employees and the State of Nevada. Plaintiff Carla Van Pelt (“plaintiff’) is a former NDOC employee. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint asserting: (1) First Amendment retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (2) Title VII retaliation; and (3) Title VII gender discrimination. Defendants now seek summary judgment on…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Norton v. PHC-Elko, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2014