Legal Opinion
Ososki v. St. Paul Surplus Lines
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 6, 2001No. 00-10026-BCPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LAWSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff commenced an action in the Isabella County, Michigan Circuit Court against a foreign insurance company seeking recovery under a policy of insurance which the defendant issued to the plaintiff. The policy was intended to reimburse the plaintiff for perils associated with accidental damage suffered during the course of plaintiffs oil well drilling operations. The defendant removed this action to this Court on the basis of the Court’s diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and has now moved for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Spigno v. Precision Pipeline, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Cherryland Mall Ltd. PartnershipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Dresser v. Cradle of Hope Adoption Center, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Iverson Industries, Inc. v. Metal Management Ohio, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Diamond Computer Systems, Inc. v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.