Legal Opinion

Loeb v. Cappelluzzo

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 21, 1991No. 1900272PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented in this case is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendants because of the plaintiff's failure of proof under the Medical Liability Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 6-5-484, which, by the pre-trial order, governed the trial of this case.1

The facts of the case are as follows. Babette Loeb, a 73-year-old, sued her medical doctor, Dr. V.P. Cappelluzzo and his professional association, for injuries she sustained after she was left unattended in an examination room in which the furnishings were allegedly unsafe. The pre-trial conference was held three months…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Parrish v. SpinkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Sellers v. NoahSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Rosemont, Inc. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Meadows v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Anderson v. Alabama Reference LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Leonard v. Providence Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Henson v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Morgan v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API