Legal Opinion
Damiano v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 6, 1996No. Civil No. 95-4795 (JBS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court is the motion of Steven D. Johnson, Esquire, counsel for the defendants, Sony Music Entertainment Inc. and Bob Dylan, for a protective order to designate all discovery material as confidential information pursuant to Rule 26(e), Fed. R.Civ.P., and Rule 15(F), General Rules for the District of New Jersey. Aso before the court are several motions by Steven M. Kramer, Esquire, counsel for the plaintiff, James Damiano:
a. for an order compelling production of documents from defendants Sony Music Entertainment and Bob Dylan;
b.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- John A. Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg Harold A. Bentzoni Kathryn Mikels John W. Osborne, II William Reber Mary Jean Knapik Maryann West Kowalshyn Richard F. Osswald Carl R. Rogers v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. T/a Pocono Record, Ronald F. Bouchard Pennsylvania Newspaper Publishers Association, Intervenors/appellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Damiano v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Constand v. CosbyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Bauer v. Mohegan Council of EldersMohegan Trial Court · 2009