Schlotterer v. Brooklyn & New York Ferry Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the -.defendant, the Brooklyn and New York Ferry Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings-on the 5th day of January, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury for $11,000, and also from an order entered in said' clerk’s office on the 5th day of January, 1903, denying the defendant’s motion for anew trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Jenks, J.:
It was stipulated upon the present record: “ That upon the trial of the action known in this proceeding as action number two, that Robert M. Daley was called as a witness on behalf of the defendant,, and that no objection was made to him or his examination by counsel for the plaintiff at that time, based upon section 834 of the Code,, and that the doctor was cross-examined by counsel for the plaintiff.” “ Action number two ” was brought on behalf of the same plaintiff *509against the same defendant to recover damages for injuries due to the same accident. In this action, the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McKinney v. Grand Street, Prospect Park & Flatbush RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- In Re Proving the Will of ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Holden v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. . BloomNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. O'ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Clifford v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Elliott v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Wallace v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.