Sutton v. Victorian
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Multnomah: Hartwell Hurley, Judge. This action was commenced on the third of July, eighteen hundred and ninety-one, by the firm of Sutton & Beebe against the boat Victorian under the provision of the boat lien law (section 3690 et seq. Hill’s Code,) to enforce a lien for materials furnished to one John F. Steffen, and used by him as a contractor in the construction of the boat. The complaint contains three causes of action.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Multnomah: Hartwell Hurley, Judge. This action was commenced on the third of July, eighteen hundred and ninety-one, by the firm of Sutton & Beebe against the boat Victorian under the provision of the boat lien law (section 3690 et seq. Hill’s Code,) to enforce a lien for materials furnished to one John F. Steffen, and used by him as a contractor in the construction of the boat. The complaint contains three causes of action. The first is on an open running account for material alleged to have been furnished by the plaintiffs between the third day of January, eighteen hundred and…
1Opinion of the Court
*196Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Bean.
This case is similar in many of its facts to the case of Smith and others against the defendant boat; commenced July thirteenth, eighteen hundred and ninety-one, to enforce a lien for materials sold and furnished Steffen between December twelfth, eighteen hundred and eighty - nine, and February twenty-sixth, eighteen hundred and ninety-one, and which were used in the construction of the boat in question. In the Smith case the constitutionality of the boat lien law, the maritime or non-maritime character of liens for materials and supplies furnished Steffen and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Skyrme v. Occidental Mill & Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Davis v. BilslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Reynolds v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Tuttle v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Krieg v. UNION PACIFIC LAND RESOURCES CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Falconio v. LarsenOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Alabama G. S. R. R. v. H. Altman Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Alderson v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.