Legal Opinion
The Naos
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 14, 1906No. 43PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the Court
HALE, District Judge.
This libel in personam was brought by Henry H. Enfield, as master, and for the owners, of the schooner Eva May against Pownal Granite Company, a corporation, to recover damages sustained by the schooner while being towed out of Cousin’s river, in this district, by the steam tug Naos. Upon the filing of the libel, the Pownal Granite Company appeared and presented a petition under admiralty rule 59, setting out that the steam tug Naos and her master, Plorace T. Perkins, ought to be proceeded against for the reason that:
“If the grounding of said schooner was not wholly or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The "Margaret."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- The Steamer SyracuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- The J. P. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Neall v. GenthnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Consolidated Coal Co. v. Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1912
- Baltimore & Boston Barge Co. v. Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1908
- Blanchard Lumber Co. v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
- In re AlexanderDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1911
- Puget Sound Commercial Co. v. Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1914