Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2006No. 04-55831Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SHIRLEY REE SMITH,  No. 04-55831 Petitioner-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. CV-01-04484-ABC GWENDOLYN MITCHELL, Warden, ORDER Respondent-Appellee.  Filed July 14, 2006 Before: Harry Pregerson and William C. Canby, Jr., Circuit Judges, and Edward C. Reed,* District Judge. Order; Dissent by Judge Bea ORDER The panel voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Pregerson has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Canby and Reed have so recommended. The petition for en banc rehearing has been circulated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Juan H. v. Walter Allen IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Peter J. BoissoneaultCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API