Legal Opinion

Norman-Bloodsaw v. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1998No. 96-16526PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves the question whether a clerical or administrative worker who undergoes a general employee health examination may, without his knowledge, be tested for highly private and sensitive medical and genetic information such as syphilis, sickle cell trait, and pregnancy.

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory is a research institution jointly operated by state and federal agencies. Plaintiffs-appellants, present and former employees of Lawrence, allege that in the course of their mandatory employment entrance examinations and on subsequent occasions, Lawrence,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Demery v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Williams v. WendlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Alfaro v. TerhuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Nora Phillips v. U.S. Customs and Border Prot.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API