Legal Opinion

Kent-Chojnicki v. Runyon

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 30, 1998No. 96-CV-360APublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ARCARA, District Judge.

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), on July 26, 1996. On October 9, 1997, plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. On January 23, 1998, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that plaintiffs’ motion be denied.

Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on March 20, 1998. Oral argument on the objections was held on March 30,1998.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Romano v. SLS Residential Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
  3. Potter v. Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. C.H., by her guardians J.G. and C.K. v. HochulDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
  5. Potter v. Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API