Legal Opinion

Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 20, 2003No. 90-CV-1086APublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ARCARA District Judge.

This antitrust case was referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), on April 24,1991. 1 On February 24, 1994, plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. On May 4, 2000, defendants filed a cross-motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. On January 3, 2003, Magistrate Judge Foschio filed an Amended Report and Recommendation, recommending, inter alia, that defendants’ cross-motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint be granted because plaintiffs lack antitrust standing. ’ Magistrate Judge Foschio found that…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  3. Ruzhinskaya v. Healthport Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Benzing v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Benzing v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API