Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Eisenman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2012No. 38703Published

1Concurrence

J. JONES, J.,

specially concurring.

I concur in the Court’s opinion, including the conclusion that neither the Estate nor the Heirs can recover underinsured motorist benefits under the Policy based on a wrongful death claim. That does not mean, however, that a personal representative, acting on behalf of an insured decedent’s estate, may not recover benefits contractually available under an insurance policy like that involved here.

Coverage P-1 of the Policy, the underinsured motorist provision, states: •

We will pay damages which an insured is legally entitled to recover from the owner or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Evans v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mortensen v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Arreguin v. Farmers Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. SchrockIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API