Legal Opinion

Herrera v. Madrak

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 20, 2000No. AC 18735PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*321 Opinion

ZARELLA, J.

The plaintiff, Linda Herrera, appeals from the judgment rendered after a jury trial awarding her $5000 in damages. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury on mitigation of damages when the evidence did not warrant such a charge, (2) failed to instruct the jury on the burden of proof with respect to mitigation of damages and (3) abused its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict and for addi-tur.1 We reverse in part the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for a new trial on the issue of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Swenson v. SawoskaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ipacs v. CranfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Kent Literary Club of Wesleyan University v. Wesleyan UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  3. Smith v. Town of ReddingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. Ryder v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API