Legal Opinion

Circle De Lumber Co. v. Humphrey

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2006No. S-11086PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Circle De Lumber Company was ordered to pay workers’ compensation benefits to Otto Humphrey for a work-related injury that Humphrey suffered in 1993. Circle De appeals the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board’s methods of calculating permanent total disability benefits rates and temporary total disability benefits rates, the retrospective interest awards to Humphrey for late-paid .benefits, and the award of attorney’s fees to Humphrey in excess of the statutory minimum. We affirm the board’s decision in all respects.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On February…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Childs v. Copper Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. DeNuptiis v. Unocal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Gilmore v. Alaska Workers' Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Thoeni v. Consumer Electronic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Smith v. University of Alaska, FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Burke v. Houston Nana, L.L.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Irby v. Fairbanks Gold Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API