Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Kerns

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 11, 1993No. Record 921431PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

The primary issues in this will contest case are (1) whether the trial court erred in ruling that the face of a holographic writing made by Edith M. Kerns contained evidence of testamentary intent, and (2) whether the trial court erred in admitting extrinsic evidence offered to establish the testamentary nature of the instrument.

Edith M. Kerns, also known as Edith B. Kerns (Edith), died on July 6, 1988. When no will was found at the time of her death, her son, George F. Kerns, qualified as administrator of her estate. Less than seven months later, Edith’s sister, Gertrude Bean, passed away.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Quesenberry v. FunkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  2. Spinks v. RiceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  3. Poindexter v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
  5. Grimes v. CrouchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Berry v. TribleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Irving v. DivitoSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  3. Drolsbaugh v. LottsVirginia Circuit Court · 2002
  4. In re Estate of DoughtieRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2006
  5. In re Estate of McKagenFairfax County Circuit Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API