Legal Opinion

People v. Gernstl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We are unpersuaded that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe. Upon considering, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular cir*1050cumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction,” we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction of the sentence (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305).

We have previously indicated that it is inappropriate for the District Attorney to fail to file a brief in opposition to defendant’s arguments and in support of the judgment of conviction unless the appeal is from a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. CollierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. DutcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API