Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Hickory

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 1929No. 19286PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

Sammie Hickory, defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as the minor, a minor Creek Indian 19 years of ag'e, by and through a next friend, filed a suit in the district court of Tulsa county to set, aside a purported appointment of guardian for himself and a guardian’s sale of his real estate.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as th'e claimants, filed answers and cross-petitions and alleged that a guardian was legally appointed for the minor and his estate; that the said guardian, «by and with the consent of the county court, sold the real estate in question to the claimants…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Courtney v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Jones v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Balbridge v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Elrod v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pfister v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Mercer v. McKeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Merkle v. WaldrepSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API