Legal Opinion

Hagerman v. Gencorp Automotive

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1995No. Docket 164880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission applied the proper standard of causation._

I

Plaintiff’s husband worked for defendant as a millwright. He injured his back at work for the first time on August 25, 1987. He allegedly reinjured his back at work on December 1, 1989. After yet another reinjury on December 20, 1989, he left work, never to return.

Plaintiff’s husband received a course of conservative treatment that failed to resolve his symptoms. On March 7, 1990, he underwent a myelogram. On March 28, 1990, he died as a result…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Smith v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. McMillian v. VlietMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Noble v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Barnes v. CAMPBELL, WYANT & CANNON FOUNDRY CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hagerman v. Gencorp AutomotiveMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hagerman v. Gencorp AutomotiveMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Hagerman v. Gencorp AutomotiveMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Hagerman v. Gencorp AutomotiveMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API