Legal Opinion
United States v. Philip Karsten Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1972No. 72-1245PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from defendant’s one-count conviction of possession of marijuana, with intent to distribute it (21U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)).
Prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress the evidence obtained, based upon an alleged illegal search of and seizure within his vehicle, of the marijuana; and because the road block which stopped his vehicle was unconstitutional.
Since this case was heard by this panel, there has been filed an opinion in United States v. McCormick, 468 F.2d 68 (10th Cir. 1972). We find it controlling on the principal issues presented herein, and therefore affirm the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. PeltierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Vernon Willis Bowman, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Charles Larue KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Dean C. LoucksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. John Rumpf, Joanne Hanson, Gloria Masters, and Gary James GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.