Legal Opinion

Yates v. Batteford

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1932No. 13828PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

Plaintiff, Yates, agreed to buy from defendant, Batteford, certain property, and the parties executed an agreement which, except for certain provisions having no bearing on the issues now involved, reads as follows:

“Agreement of Sale
“Frank P. Batteford to H. P. Yates
“It is hereby agreed by and between Frank P. Batteford, of the city of New Orleans, Party of the first part, and H. P. Yates, also of the city of New Orleans, party of the second part; — •
“That the said party of the first part jais heirs or assigns for and in consideration of the price and sum of $2000.00, and the conditions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Legier v. BraughnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Blanchard v. HaberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Girault v. FeuchtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  4. Bennett v. FullerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  5. Salles v. Stafford, Derbes & Roy, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Geist v. LehmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. Arkansas Fuel Oil Corporation v. MaggioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Leon v. DupreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Haeuser v. CastrogiovanniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  5. Haeuser v. CastrogiovanniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API