Haeuser v. Castrogiovanni
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentTate, Justice
I concur with'the majority opinion on rehearing insofar as it concludes that the use or sub-lease of the property by the family corporation of plaintiff did not defeat any of plaintiff’s rights under the option agreement contained in the lease. However, I respectfully dissent insofar as this opinion holds that any provision requiring a deposit upon exercise of an option *931converts the option agreement into an earnest money transaction.
Most favorably to the contention of the defendants-appellants, and as held by the majority opinion on rehearing, the option in the lease-option agreement of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Murphy v. HusseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Kinberger v. DrouetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Ducuy v. FalgoustSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Amiss v. Witting's Ex'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Moresi v. BurleighSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.