Legal Opinion

Bullock v. City of Ashland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 2011No. 043972E7, 043971Z3 A131252 (Control), A133660Published

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Petitioner initiated a writ of review action challenging the City of Ashland’s decision to form a local improvement district (LID) in order to assess the cost of constructing sidewalks and certain street improvements within the proposed district. 1 Petitioner is trustee of property within the LID boundary and will be assessed for a portion of the cost of the improvements. Before the reviewing court, petitioner argued, among other things, that the city’s decision should be voided because the LID boundary was “gerrymandered” and because a city employee involved in planning the LID…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Salosha, Inc. v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Baker v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. School District No. 3J v. City of WilsonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Home Builders Ass'n of Metropolitan Portland v. City of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Dames v. City Council for City of Forest GroveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API