Stratton v. Ham
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Wayne Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court · DavisonDavison, J.
Ham and Clark, on the 29th of March, 1851, sued out a writ of foreign attachment against Benjamin and Samuel Hill, for the recovery of 270 dollars. At the same time an affidavit was filed wherein it is charged that Stratton and Parry are the executors of Robert Hill deceased, and, as such, have the possession, control, and agency of goods, moneys, and effects of said Benjamin and Samuel, to which they are entitled as heirs of the decedent; and which goods, &c., the sheriff cannot attach by virtue of the writ of attachment, &c. Upon this affidavit a summons was duly issued and served upon…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Parsons.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marsteller v. FawU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1803
- Brooks v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
- Wilder v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Barnes v. TreatMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
- Picquet v. SwanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1827
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jacksonville Electric Light Co. v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Woodbine Savings Bank v. YagerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. MiracleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Simonds v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- People's Savings Bank v. HoppeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.