Legal Opinion

Adley v. Paier

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 24, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

The defendants are the owners of premises, at 6 Prospect Court in Hamden, which they purchased in 1957. Since September, 1957, they have conducted, in the building on this property, an art school as a permitted use in a residential zone. Hamden Zoning Regs. ■§§ 4, 34.1.11 (1930, as amended). On March 18, 1958, they purchased a vacant lot immediately adjoining the school on the east. It has a frontage of about ninety-one feet on Prospect Court. After its acquisition, it was used to a limited extent for the parking of automobiles, and since September, 1958, about twenty-five cars of faculty and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fairlawns Cemetery Assn., Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Town of Harvard v. MaxantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. State v. Stonybrook, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API