Previto v. Ryobi North America, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO LIMIT AND/OR EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF CERTAIN “EXPERT” WITNESSES
HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is the Motion to Limit and/or Exclude the Testimony of Certain “Expert” Witnesses [174], filed on July 15, 2010, by Defendants One World Technologies, Inc., and Ryobi Technologies, Inc., in the above captioned cause. Plaintiff has filed an Opposition [202], and Defendants a Reply [209]. After consideration of the submissions and the relevant legal authorities, and for the reasons discussed below, the Court finds…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- VINEYARD INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BAILEY Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Bryant v. 3M Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2015
- Alma L. Gomez and Alberto F. Gomez v. Honda Motor Co., LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Williams v. USAA Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2022