Legal Opinion

Lorenz Co. v. Gray

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Among other things, it is urged by demurrer and oft-repeated objections on the part of defendants Day & Company, B. A. Kliks and Dorothy L. Kliks as to each cause of suit, that the complaint of plaintiff does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of suit against said defendants. We are confronted, therefore, with the necessity of determining the sufficiency of these alleged causes of suit. For the purposes of such determination, we must apply the requisites prescribed by statute. The statute prescribes that there must be a notice of delivery to the owner or reputed owner by mail,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Schucking v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Strong v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Benson v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Somers v. HansonOregon Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Chambliss Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Yoshida v. Security InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Wright v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Andersen v. TurpinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Shea v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API