Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1979No. 56080PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

Andrew Garrison Clark appeals from his conviction for obtaining a controlled substance by use of a forged prescription. Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, Article 4476-15, Section 4.09(a)(3). Punishment was assessed by the court at five years. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.

Clark contends the indictment is insufficient. He argues that obtaining a controlled substance by use of a forged prescription can only be prosecuted under the general forgery statute, that the indictment must allege specifically how the controlled substance was obtained by fraud…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alejos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Ex Parte HarrellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HolbrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  3. Bush v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1982
  4. Kipperman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API