Clark v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
Andrew Garrison Clark appeals from his conviction for obtaining a controlled substance by use of a forged prescription. Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, Article 4476-15, Section 4.09(a)(3). Punishment was assessed by the court at five years. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
Clark contends the indictment is insufficient. He argues that obtaining a controlled substance by use of a forged prescription can only be prosecuted under the general forgery statute, that the indictment must allege specifically how the controlled substance was obtained by fraud…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alejos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Ex Parte HarrellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ex Parte HolbrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Bush v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1982
- Kipperman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.