Lucero v. City of Trinidad
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves an award of attorneys’ fees in a civil rights case alleging violations of 42 U.S.G. § 1983. The underlying case was settled prior to trial, but the parties failed to reach agreement on the amount of attorneys’ fees owed to plaintiff’s attorneys. Plaintiff was the “prevailing party” and thus is entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees. 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The only issue to be resolved on appeal is whether the district court erred in setting the amount of attorneys’ fees for the lawyers, law students, and legal assistants who worked on this case.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Gurule v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by49 opinions
- Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Oliver S. Brown v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Etc., Mobil Oil Corporation, Ashland Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Ellis v. University of Kansas Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Malloy v. MonahanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Zuchel v. DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.