Legal Opinion
Remote Solution Co. v. FGH Liquidating Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 2, 2009No. 08-3662Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Chief Judge.
Remote Solution Co., Ltd. appeals from the District Court’s denial of its motion to vacate or modify an arbitral award. The underlying dispute involves an agreement between Remote Solution and Contec Corporation.1 The arbitrator determined Remote Solution had agreed to defend and indemnify Contec against certain patent infringement claims brought by third parties and awarded damages to Contec, as well as fees and costs. The District Court denied Remote Solution’s motion to vacate or modify the arbitral award and entered judgment for Contec. We will…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- CONTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Dluhos v. StrasbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.