Gresham v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROONEY, Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment and sentence rendered after a jury trial in which appellant was found guilty of the crime of incest in violation of § 6-4-402, W.S.1977. The only issue on appeal is whether or not the trial court properly handled the voir dire process. Specifically, appellant contends that the court’s questions and comments to the jurors during the voir dire prevented the selection of fair-minded jurors.
We affirm.
The jury consisted of twelve people and one alternate. Each side had eight peremptory challenges, and fifteen of the sixteen peremptory challenges were…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Jahnke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Summers v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Herdt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Kerns v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.