Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1994No. Nos. 60371, 62764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

In a previous opinion we affirmed convictions and sentences on ten felony charges. State v. Harris, 860 S.W.2d 839 (Mo.App.E.D.1993). At the request of the parties we remanded for a Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) hearing, on the state’s preemptory strikes. The trial court conducted the hearing. It denied defendant’s due process challenge.

We find no error in findings that the prosecutor furnished legally sufficient, race-neutral, and non-pretextual reasons to strike one white and two black venirepersons from the panel and one black…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Missouri v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. NormanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API