Legal Opinion

In the Interest of M. L.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 21, 2008No. A08A0880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following the termination of her parental rights to M. L., D. W, T. S., and R. S., the natural mother of these children appeals, *438challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. We hold that the mother’s failure to comply with the reunification case plan, to bond with the children, or to support the children authorized the juvenile court’s decision to terminate her parental rights. Accordingly, we affirm.

In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a termination of parental rights case, the question is whether any rational trier of fact could have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Interest of R. N. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. In the Interest of D. L. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. In the Interest of R. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. In the Interest of M. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In the Interest of M. S. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. In the Interest of S. N. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. In the Interest of C. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. In the Interest of T. B. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. In re Interest of B.R.J.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API