In the Interest of D. L. S.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.
Following the termination of their parental rights to their four children, the natural parents of D. L. S., R. L. S., K. L. S., and N. S. appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Because evidence supported all relevant factors for termination, we discern no error and affirm.
The following standard applies when parents challenge the sufficiency of the evidence in a termination rights case:
On appeal, we must determine whether, after reviewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the lower court’s judgments, any rational trier of fact could have found…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In the Interest of E. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- In the Interest of R. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- In the Interest of J. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
3Cited by26 opinions
- In the Interest of S. N. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- In the Interest of B. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- In the Interest of H. E. M. O.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- In the Interest of R. D. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- In the Interest of M. L.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.