Young v. Energy Transportation Systems Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentDarrell Hickman, Justice
This is an eminent domain case and the majority is consistent with past judicial approaches which are liberal and approve most claims of the power of eminent domain. The legislation which is the basis of the asserted power of eminent domain is arbitrary at the least, vague at best, and cannot in my judgment be the basis of the proposed condemnation. If the General Assembly intended what has been approved, then it was neglectful of its duty.
What has been approved is that a corporation, a subsidiary in fact of a foreign partnership, has filed articles declaring it has the power of eminent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- City of Little Rock v. SawyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Patterson Orchard Co. v. Southwest Arkansas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Walker v. Shasta Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v. Patterson Orchard Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.