Legal Opinion
Pierce v. County of Orange
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 2, 2012No. SACV 01-981 ABC (MLGx)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS; PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO TAX COSTS
AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are two motions for attorney’s fees filed by Plaintiffs Fred Pierce, et al.: the first was filed on July 31, 2009 and supplemented on August 12, 2011 (Docket Nos. 665, 793); and the *1023second was filed on August 12, 2011 (Docket No. 792). Defendants County of Orange, et al. (the “County”) opposed the current motions on September 29, 2011 and Plaintiffs replied on October 7, 2011. The Court found these matters appropriate for resolution without…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Barrita, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Dowd v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Kelly v. WenglerDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2014
- ACF 2006 Corp v. Law Offices of Michael J. Libman APCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Aoki v. GilbertDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.