Legal Opinion

Hendershot v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the CourtVickery, J.

This cause comes into this court on a petition in error to the criminal branch of the municipal court of the city of Cleveland, the purpose of which is to reverse a conviction had in the court below under the so-called Crabbe Act.

The record shows that an affidavit was filed charging the defendant. Frank Hendershot, with having in his possession certain intoxicating liquors, to-wit, whiskey, at 8014 Wade Park avenue, and upon the trial of said action he was found guilty, and fined the sum of $1,000, of which $500 was immediately remitted.

*431It seems that defendant below was carrying on a soft…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ignath v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Nekruta v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API