Legal Opinion
United States v. Hatfield
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 14, 2011No. 2:06-cr-00550PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Pending before the Court is the Government’s motion to enter a preliminary order of forfeiture against Defendants David H. Brooks and Sandra Hatfield. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS this motion IN PART and DENIES this motion IN PART. However, the Court does not issue any specific forfeiture award at this time. Instead, it RESERVES JUDGMENT IN PART and hereby requests supplemental calculations and briefing consistent with this Order.
BACKGROUND
In October 2007, the Government charged Mr. Brooks and Ms. Hatfield with numerous crimes,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Wayne Gaskin, AKA "Atiba," and Al CastleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- King County v. IKB Deutsche Industriebank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RazmilovicDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. Michael GlukCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Michael GlukCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Molina-SanchezDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.