Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Morris

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1979No. 3019PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

In this appeal from denial of relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act,1 appellant contends that he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea to criminal conspiracy and robbery because the trial court, before accepting the plea, did not explain at the plea colloquy the elements of the crimes charged. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the order of the PCHA court and remand to afford appellant an opportunity to withdraw his plea.2

*364On March 4,1974, appellant, assisted by counsel, entered a plea of guilty to criminal conspiracy and robbery and, after a colloquy, the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. IngramSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. ChumleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. DilbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. KulpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. HareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TanurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API