Legal Opinion
United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646 v. Hanneman
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 2005No. 25442PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
MOON, C.J.
Respondents-appellants/eross-appellees Mufi Hanneman, Mayor of the City and County of Honolulu; Kenneth Nakamatsu, Director of the Department of Human Resources for the City and County of Honolulu; and Frank Doyle, Refuse Collection and Disposal Division Chief of the Department of Environmental Services for the City and County of Honolulu 1 [collectively, the City], appeal from the first circuit court’s October 4, 2002 final judgment, affirming ageney-ap-pellee/eross-appellee the Hawaii Labor Relations Board’s (HLRB) Decision No. 433 [hereinafter, HLRB’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Camara v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
- Morgan v. Planning Department, County of KauaiHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- Paul's Electrical Service, Inc. v. BefitelHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- Guth v. FreelandHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Reefshare, Ltd. v. NagataHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hawaii Government Employees Ass'n, AFSCME Local 152 v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
- Ueoka v. SzymanskiHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- Mauna Kea Anaina Hou v. Board of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 2015
- GOV'T EMPLOYEES ASS'N v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
- In re Grievance Arbitration Between State of Hawaii Organization of Police OfficersHawaii Supreme Court · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.